My new permanent chastity device!
A first look at the Permanent Saint version 1.1 from Custom Chastity
Around about the two-and-half year mark, my prototype permanent Saint from Custom Chastity snapped!
Eighteen months is pretty good for a prototype. Even so, it felt… Weird? Unsettling?
I got straight into my old locking Saint, and Xena had me seal it with polymorph plastic.
However, after so long in the new Saint with its oval ring and generous “gap”, my old Saint didn’t feel as comfortable, so I pleaded with Lady Fox, who started working on a new design for me to trial. To tide me over, she sent me a slightly modified replacement Saint with two base rings — it was the tab on the base ring that snapped — so in theory I’m good for the next five years.
(Gulp.) Damn you, Lindy Effect!
And here it is!
A word about the diabolical locking system
If you’ve just tuned in to my very kinky married life, both chastity cage models have the same diabolical locking system; six snap-in seals.
Removing them requires… I’m not exactly sure, but maybe a craft drill to breach the cap, then a screwdriver to lever it out. Time and fuss, anyway. Not something you’d do casually, or at 2am when you were horny.
“Permanent” as in “permanently nailed shut” and “permanent residence”.
That’s why this is a permanent chastity device — “permanent” as in “permanently nailed shut” and “permanent residence”.
However, that’s not what’s s diabolical about this system.
The Devil is in the seemingly trivial detail that there are ONLY six (6) seals. Once you’ve installed the last seal, you need to buy a new pack — which won’t be cheap — or else the device is useless.
This creates a delicious slippery slope, and plausible deniability for vanilla keyholders: “Sorry darling, but I need a new handbag. No Christmas release for you.”
Not for us, though.
Xena had me seal myself in, then tossed the remaining seals in the back of her bedside drawer. And there they’ve stayed for nearly three years…
(There are also possibilities for remote keyholding — sending out a replacement snap-seal, rather than receiving a key. And of course it’s good for chastity device makers, because it creates a subscription model.)
What’s new in the Custom Chastity Permanent Saint 1.1?
The original design was scarily wearable — the chastity equivalent of barefoot sandals. The 1.1 version has some changes. Most of them are definitely enhancements:
Swept-back tube opening: Ages ago, we found that we could eliminate most turtling by having the tube part of a cage end before the crown of the penis. This takes that philosophy a little further.
Opening with bigger arc: Basically, there is now nothing under the tip of my penis, which makes peeing easier and prevents drips from pooling.
Wider “paperclip”: The paper clip end was originally designed to accommodate people with foreskins — it allows you to pull the thing back and clean it… so I’m told. I’m cut, but like the minimalist head shape. This wider version makes for a significantly blunter profile under clothes, and also makes peeing pretty foolproof.
Top and bottom vents removed: I think Lady Fox wants to try these to see if they work — removing them makes the design simpler and stronger, and some people prefer the coverage. I thought I’d miss the way the vents let me poke my penis back into place. So far, this hasn’t been an issue because of the short tube section and wider paperclip. However, I am not sure what the effect will be on hygiene and getting dry after a shower. Only time will tell.
Back hood removed (not shown): The original version had a back hood. I don’t like these because the device tends to hinge on them when I’m on all fours, so Lady Fox kindly removed it.
Rear of tube braced on base ring (not shown): The contact between the two components braces them against upwards pressure caused by an abortive erection, or by towelling the scrotum in that nook. I suspect that simple change will improve the durability.
Summing up
I’m not sure how the vents will play out. With that caveat, Lady Fox has excelled herself. This is a very wearable device, and the spare base ring negates any worries about durability. (Apparently these aren’t for sale yet.)
Xena hasn’t said what she thinks yet — I’m guessing her main interest is in long-term wearability…
Me? I’m blown away.
If first discovered male chastity in my university library, in an old book on crank medicine, and just looking at the illustrations gave me an instant fetish. (Supernormal stimulation seems to do that?) About thirty seconds after I acquired that fetish, I sank into despair: this was pre Internet, so where was I going to get a male chastity device?
Now here I am sealed into a very high-tech device that’s designed to remain installed indefinitely, and probably could.
Just wow.